<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>labs@laan blog - Latest Comments in evolution not revolution</title><link>http://labslaanblog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://labslaanblog.disqus.com/evolution_not_revolution/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:17:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: evolution not revolution</title><link>http://labs.laan.com/blog/2008/08/evolution-not-revolution/#comment-6688070</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very good points raised here - I liked your take on Basecamp's project management software.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gantt Chart Software</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:17:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: evolution not revolution</title><link>http://labs.laan.com/blog/2008/08/evolution-not-revolution/#comment-4527951</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Spot on--twitter is quite similar to the away message of yore.  I think the reason a lot of people don't get twitter is that it takes quite a bit of work on the user's part to make it valuable. That is, with twitter, you really need to expend a bit of energy finding people to connect with and giving it a go before you start to see the benefits.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would guess there's a good chance that twitter will not even be the dominant innovator in their space--there's still lots of room for someone to come in, learn from twitter's mistakes, and do things better.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Snackfeed is on the right track and in a killer market for innovation.  Looking forward to seeing the next evolution of the service..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(aside) I'm digging your quote: "snackfeed is the next evolution (not the next revolution) in web video"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kortina</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:04:49 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>